The Media’s Role in Addressing Grooming Gangs
The issue of “grooming gangs” has been a heated topic in the UK for years, especially after cases like the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal (1997–2013). Recently, I have noticed a resurgence of this discussion, particularly on social media platforms like X, where the same familiar and troubling narratives have reappeared.
Photo credit by Yevhenii Orlov/Getty Images
While protecting young people from predators is absolutely vital, the way this issue is framed often feels more like a tool for pushing an anti-Muslim agenda rather than a genuine effort to tackle child exploitation. Discussions and media coverage disproportionately focus on offenders of South Asian and Muslim backgrounds, despite clear evidence that child sexual abuse occurs across all ethnicities.
This selective focus fuels harmful stereotypes, reinforcing the false idea that grooming gangs are a uniquely Muslim problem. Not only does this distort public understanding of the issue, but it also has real-world consequences— contributing to discrimination, hate crimes, and further marginalisation of Muslim communities. Instead of scapegoating a particular group, the focus should be on tackling the deeper, systemic failures that allow these horrific crimes to continue.
Why the Media Should Help Fix the Problem, Not Fuel Division
The term “grooming gangs” refers to groups of men who target young people, particularly children, for sexual exploitation through a process called grooming. Grooming involves building a relationship of trust with the victim over time, often by offering gifts, attention, or affection, before manipulating and coercing them into sexual activity. These offenders prey on vulnerable children, often those from marginalised backgrounds or difficult home environments as seen in BBC’s Three Girls.
The issue first caught widespread attention in 2002 when Labour MP Ann Cryer raised concerns about young girls being groomed by gangs of men in her constituency of Keighley, Yorkshire. And then, in 2010, the conviction of five men in Rotherham for abusing girls aged 12 to 16 brought the issue further into the public eye.
As media outlets began reporting on these cases, they noted that the perpetrators were predominantly of Pakistani heritage. This detail quickly became a focal point in the coverage, and unfortunately, it fed into a broader anti-Muslim narrative. The media’s emphasis on the ethnic background of the offenders led to the stereotyping of Muslim and South Asian communities, with many unfairly associating the crimes with entire ethnic and religious groups rather than viewing the issue as one of exploitation that affects all communities. This narrative has persisted over the years, overshadowing the real complexity of the problem and fostering division and prejudice.
Let’s take a moment to debunk this narrative. Home Secretary Suella Braverman has made several comments emphasising the ethnicity of perpetrators in high-profile grooming gang cases, claiming that these abusers are predominantly British-Pakistani men. But why has there been so little attention given to the 2010 convictions of a group of white men, along with a woman, who were sentenced for abusing 30 children in the Camborne area of Cornwall? Despite the scale of the abuse, this case received far less media coverage. The selective focus on the ethnicity of certain offenders has created an imbalanced narrative, ignoring the broader issue of child sexual exploitation, which affects all communities, regardless of race or background.
I truly believe it is more important now than ever for media outlets to shift their focus—from sensationalising the ethnicity of offenders to actually promoting real, meaningful solutions. The way these stories are often told, it feels like the media is more interested in turning child exploitation into a “Muslim Asian” issue, rather than addressing the deeper, systematic failures that allow this abuse to continue. This kind of framing does not protect children—it just fuels division, fear, and misunderstanding.
Instead of stoking cultural blame, the media should be using its influence to hold institutions accountable. They should be putting pressure on police forces, social workers, schools, and government bodies to act faster, listen better, and protect children before the worst happens. We need the focus to be on prevention, not just punishment. The narratives needs to move from who the abusers are, to how we stop this from happening in the first place.
Some might say it is “too little, too late,” but I disagree because progress is being made, and it deserves more attention. In April 2023, the government launched the Grooming Gangs Taskforce, working with all 43 police forces across England and Wales. Additionally, new measures in the Criminal Justice Bill are also worth highlighting. They make it a legal duty for professionals to report suspected abuse and stop convicted sex offenders from changing their names to avoid justice.
The media should not just report the horrors after the fact. They should spotlight what is being done to prevent abuse, amplify survivors’ voices, and push for better systems.
This is fundamentally an issue of child protection, not race. When media narratives disproportionately focus on the ethnicity or religion of perpetrators—particularly in cases involving individuals from Muslim or South Asian backgrounds—they contribute to harmful stereotypes and risk obscuring the broader, more complex realities of abuse. It is worth noting that when white individuals commit similar crimes, their actions are rarely framed as reflective of their entire racial or cultural group. This double standard reinforces racial bias and detracts from the need for an inclusive and effective safeguarding approach.
Given the media’s significant influence on public perception and policy discourse, it is imperative that this power be used responsibly—to inform, to protect, and to unify, rather than to divide.
The Dangerous Impact of Media Bias and Sensationalism
Right-wing media outlets, in particular, often use sensationalist and inflammatory language that stokes fear and resentment. For example, headlines like “RAPE HELL: Asian grooming gang made two vulnerable girls in Rochdale ‘sex slaves’ after preying on them from age of 13, court told” (The Sun) explicitly highlight the offenders’ ethnicity, using graphic and emotive wording to stir outrage. By emphasising the term “Asian,” the headline wrongly suggests that grooming gangs are specific to South Asian communities, ignoring the fact that child sexual exploitation affects all ethnic groups. The sensationalist language, such as “‘RAPE HELL’,” focuses on shock value rather than the deeper issues of systemic failures in safeguarding. This type of reporting fuels racial prejudice and anti-Muslim hate, while distracting from the broader problem of child exploitation, and undermines efforts to create a more inclusive and solution-focused dialogue. Would we ever see a headline beginning with “White grooming gang”? The answer is almost always no.
An even more concerning example can be recently seen by an article by The Daily Mail titled “Britain's Asian grooming gangs scandal laid bare: Interactive map reveals shocking extent of predatory men who sexually abused young girls across FORTY ONE UK towns...” Not only does the headline unnecessarily racialise the issue, but the use of an interactive map borders on vigilantism. It risks painting entire communities with a broad brush, effectively placing targets on the backs of innocent people. In the wrong hands, this type of coverage can—and has—led to real-world violence.
A stark and tragic example of this came in June 2017, when a terrorist attack was carried out against mosque-goers in Finsbury Park. The attacker, Darren Osborne, had been radicalised in part by right-wing propaganda and misinformation. During his trial, it was revealed that he became obsessed with Muslims after watching the BBC drama Three Girls, a series based on real-life grooming cases. Rather than understanding the complexity of the issue, Osborne fixated on ethnicity and used it to justify hate. This shows just how dangerous media narratives can be when they reduce criminal acts to a matter of race or religion.
The consequences for Muslim communities have been profound—rising levels of anti-Muslim hate. British Muslims already face increased scrutiny in public life, and this kind of targeted media coverage only deepens the divide. It fosters mistrust, alienation, and resentment at a time when unity and understanding are more important than ever.
The media and public figures have a real responsibility to do better. Journalism should be fair, accurate, and provide proper context. When reporting on crime, unnecessary racial labels should be avoided unless they’re truly important to the story. Public figures, meanwhile, shouldn’t use divisive language to score political points. Instead, they should focus on conversations about protecting children, improving institutions, and delivering justice for victims—without making it about race.
If we really want to protect children, we need to stop blaming entire communities and start holding the right systems accountable. Sensational headlines may grab attention, but they don’t help solve the problem.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the issue of grooming gangs must be approached with nuance, responsibility, and a focus on child protection, not racial division. The media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception, and it must move beyond sensationalism and divisive rhetoric. By highlighting systemic failures and promoting solutions, media outlets can help foster a more informed and unified approach to combating child exploitation. The focus should be on accountability, prevention, and support for survivors, rather than scapegoating entire communities based on race or ethnicity.
